Diversity and distribution of reptiles in Romania
Occurence data from Cogălniceanu D, Rozylowicz L, Székely P, Samoilă C, Stănescu F, Tudor M, Székely D, Iosif R (2013) Diversity and distribution of reptiles in Romania. ZooKeys 341: 49-76 https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.341.5502
Registros
Los datos en este registros biológicos recurso han sido publicados como Archivo Darwin Core(DwC-A), el cual es un formato estándar para compartir datos de biodiversidad como un conjunto de una o más tablas de datos. La tabla de datos del core contiene 16.527 registros.
Este IPT archiva los datos, sirviendo así como repositorio de datos. Los datos y metadatos están disponibles para descargar en la sección de descargas. La tabla de versiones muestra otras versiones del recurso que se han hecho accesibles al público y permite el seguimiento de los cambios hechos al recurso en el tiempo.
Descargas
Descargue la última versión de los datos como un Archivo Darwin Core (DwC-A) o los metadatos como EML o RTF:
Versiones
La siguiente tabla muestra sólo las versiones publicadas del recurso que son de acceso público.
¿Cómo referenciar?
Los usuarios deben citar este trabajo de la siguiente manera:
Cogălniceanu D, Rozylowicz L, Székely P, Samoilă C, Stănescu F, Tudor M, Székely D, Iosif R (2020): Diversity and distribution of reptiles in Romania. v1.1. ZooKeys. Dataset/Occurrence. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.341.5502
Derechos
Los usuarios deben respetar los siguientes derechos de uso:
El publicador y propietario de los derechos de este trabajo es ZooKeys. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.
Registro GBIF
Este recurso no ha sido registrado en GBIF
Palabras Clave
Occurrence; Observation
Contactos
¿Quién creó el recurso?:
¿Quién puede resolver dudas acerca del recurso?:
¿Quién documentó los metadatos?:
Cobertura Geográfica
Romania
Coordenadas límite | Latitud Mínima Longitud Mínima [43,612, 20,039], Latitud Máxima Longitud Máxima [48,342, 30,059] |
---|
Cobertura Taxonómica
Reptiles of Romania at species level
Especie | Emys orbicularis, Testudo graeca, Testudo hermanni, Anguis fragilis, Eremias arguta, Lacerta agilis, Darevskia praticola, Lacerta trilineata, Lacerta viridis, Zootoca vivipara, Podarcis muralis, Podarcis tauricus, Ablepharus kitaibelii, Eryx jaculus, Coronella austriaca, Zamenis longissimus, Elaphe sauromates, Dolichophis caspius, Natrix natrix, Natrix tessellata, Vipera ammodytes, Vipera berus, Vipera ursinii |
---|
Cobertura Temporal
Fecha Inicial / Fecha Final | 1823-01-01 / 2013-01-01 |
---|
Métodos de Muestreo
We extracted the occurrence records from four major sources: published data, museum collections, personal communications from specialists, and our own unpublished field data. The records were primarily stored and managed in a Microsoft Access database, and later imported it in an ESRI file geodatabase using ArcGIS Desktop 10.1 (ESRI, CA). We checked for data quality by (1) filtering the database for doubtful and erroneous records, (2) aggregating the known localities to a finer resolution, and (3) assessing the bias in sampling effort. Our own data were collected over a period of almost 25 years and it involved a large variety of methods. Since the majority of studies carried out were of ecology, the detailed distribution data was not made available in the resulting publications. We aggregated the occurrence records to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) grid system at a spatial resolution of 25 km2 (UTM 5 × 5 km). The records with a spatial resolution of ≤ 25 km2 were assigned the corresponding UTM 5 × 5 km grid cell code using primarily the UTM index of localities (Lehrer and Lehrer 1990). The species occurrences with a spatial resolution of > 25 km2 were assigned only one grid cell code based on expert knowledge of the species’ habitat requirements (Scott et al. 2002, Franklin 2009) and visual help from the available satellite imagery and an overlaid KMZ file with the UTM 5 × 5 km grid in Google Earth v. 7.0.2 (Google Inc., CA). In order to georeference all records in the geodatabase in ArcGIS Desktop, we created a relationship between the table with species occurrence records and the UTM 5 × 5 km polygon feature class based on the grid cell code as a common attribute.
Área de Estudio | Romania |
---|---|
Control de Calidad | The distribution records that could not be georeferenced to an actual locality or toponym (e.g., occurrences assigned to mountain ranges, geographical provinces or hydrographic basins) or records with unspecified taxa within genera were not included in the geodatabase. Other doubtful or erroneous records such as species out of their known range or vagrant individuals sensu IUCN (2001) were also discarded. The species taxonomy considered in the present paper is based on Speybroeck et al. (2010). Due to rapid changes in taxonomy, we did not analyze the subspecies in our study, except for Vipera (Acridophaga) ursinii, to which detailed studies have confirmed the relevance of taxonomic unit (Ferchaud et al. 2012). While the taxonomic status of Anguis fragilis is still under debate, we considered the species complex as a single species (Gvoždík et al. 2010). We encountered a similar problem for Vipera (berus) nikolskii; therefore we did not examine it separately from Vipera berus (Zinenko et al. 2010). |
Descripción de la metodología paso a paso:
Metadatos Adicionales
Identificadores Alternativos | http://ipt.pensoft.net/resource?r=reptiles_romania |
---|