Diversity and distribution of reptiles in Romania
データ レコード
ダウンロード
バージョン
次の表は、公にアクセス可能な公開バージョンのリソースのみ表示しています。
引用方法
研究者はこの研究内容を以下のように引用する必要があります。:
Cogălniceanu D, Rozylowicz L, Székely P, Samoilă C, Stănescu F, Tudor M, Székely D, Iosif R (2020): Diversity and distribution of reptiles in Romania. v1.1. ZooKeys. Dataset/Occurrence. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.341.5502
権利
研究者は権利に関する下記ステートメントを尊重する必要があります。:
パブリッシャーとライセンス保持者権利者は ZooKeys。 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.
GBIF登録
このリソースは GBIF に登録されていません。
キーワード
Occurrence; Observation
連絡先
リソースを作成した人:
リソースに関する質問に答えることができる人:
メタデータを記載した人:
地理的範囲
Romania
| 座標（緯度経度） | 南 西 [43.612, 20.039], 北 東 [48.342, 30.059] |
|---|
生物分類学的範囲
Reptiles of Romania at species level
| Species | Emys orbicularis, Testudo graeca, Testudo hermanni, Anguis fragilis, Eremias arguta, Lacerta agilis, Darevskia praticola, Lacerta trilineata, Lacerta viridis, Zootoca vivipara, Podarcis muralis, Podarcis tauricus, Ablepharus kitaibelii, Eryx jaculus, Coronella austriaca, Zamenis longissimus, Elaphe sauromates, Dolichophis caspius, Natrix natrix, Natrix tessellata, Vipera ammodytes, Vipera berus, Vipera ursinii |
|---|
時間的範囲
| 開始日 / 終了日 | 1823-01-01 / 2013-01-01 |
|---|
収集方法
We extracted the occurrence records from four major sources: published data, museum collections, personal communications from specialists, and our own unpublished field data. The records were primarily stored and managed in a Microsoft Access database, and later imported it in an ESRI file geodatabase using ArcGIS Desktop 10.1 (ESRI, CA). We checked for data quality by (1) filtering the database for doubtful and erroneous records, (2) aggregating the known localities to a finer resolution, and (3) assessing the bias in sampling effort. Our own data were collected over a period of almost 25 years and it involved a large variety of methods. Since the majority of studies carried out were of ecology, the detailed distribution data was not made available in the resulting publications. We aggregated the occurrence records to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) grid system at a spatial resolution of 25 km2 (UTM 5 × 5 km). The records with a spatial resolution of ≤ 25 km2 were assigned the corresponding UTM 5 × 5 km grid cell code using primarily the UTM index of localities (Lehrer and Lehrer 1990). The species occurrences with a spatial resolution of > 25 km2 were assigned only one grid cell code based on expert knowledge of the species’ habitat requirements (Scott et al. 2002, Franklin 2009) and visual help from the available satellite imagery and an overlaid KMZ file with the UTM 5 × 5 km grid in Google Earth v. 7.0.2 (Google Inc., CA). In order to georeference all records in the geodatabase in ArcGIS Desktop, we created a relationship between the table with species occurrence records and the UTM 5 × 5 km polygon feature class based on the grid cell code as a common attribute.
| Study Extent | Romania |
|---|---|
| Quality Control | The distribution records that could not be georeferenced to an actual locality or toponym (e.g., occurrences assigned to mountain ranges, geographical provinces or hydrographic basins) or records with unspecified taxa within genera were not included in the geodatabase. Other doubtful or erroneous records such as species out of their known range or vagrant individuals sensu IUCN (2001) were also discarded. The species taxonomy considered in the present paper is based on Speybroeck et al. (2010). Due to rapid changes in taxonomy, we did not analyze the subspecies in our study, except for Vipera (Acridophaga) ursinii, to which detailed studies have confirmed the relevance of taxonomic unit (Ferchaud et al. 2012). While the taxonomic status of Anguis fragilis is still under debate, we considered the species complex as a single species (Gvoždík et al. 2010). We encountered a similar problem for Vipera (berus) nikolskii; therefore we did not examine it separately from Vipera berus (Zinenko et al. 2010). |
Method step description: